My writings on the Nation, Torah, and Land of Israel. To see my artwork, please visit Painting Israel.
Thursday, April 25, 2013
The Sanctuary of the Altar
When Shlomo’s (Solomon’s) right-hand
man Benayahu comes after Adoniyah and Yoav, both of them grab the horns of the
altar. But the sanctuary offered by the altar was to allow a chance for the
accused to get a fair trial. Adoniyah and Yoav seem to see it as some sort of
“Home Base,” where no one can ever get them. Much like the army thought that
the Ark was a magic want that guaranteed victory earlier in Shmuel (The Book of
Samuel.) In both cases, it was a lethal mistake.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
The Buck Stops with the King
After Yoav’s (Joab) execution,
Shlomo (Solomon) refers to Avner and Amasa, both of whom Yoav assassinated
against David’s orders, ”And their blood shall return upon the head of Yoav…
but upon David… there shall be peace forever from the Lord.” Even though David
specifically ordered Yoav not to kill Avner and Amasa, the fact that Yoav did
so while under David’s authority meant that David was culpable. I.e., for a
king, “The buck stops here.”
Thursday, April 04, 2013
Women in Tanach
For those who mistakenly believe
that women are somehow not central to Tanach (Bible): David’s first act upon
abdicating the throne to his son Shlomo (Solomon) was to turn and prostrate
himself top Shlomo. King Shlomo, sitting on the throne when his mother Bat
Sheva (Bathsheeba) walks in, then prostrates himself to HER. It seems that she
was a sort of joint-ruler, as most of Shlomo’s problems and failures didn’t
begin until after her death. There are midrashim (Talmudic stories) of her
spanking him for misbehavior throughout his adult life.
Wednesday, April 03, 2013
David as an Old Man
At the beginning of Sefer Melachim
(The Book of Kings,) we see David as an old man who can’t even keep himself
warm. His son Adoniyah counts on his father’s decrepitude to usurp David’s
chosen successor Shlomo (Solomon.) Suddenly David rises up, puts Shlomo on his
mule, anoints him, and issues him decrees for unfinished business. It’s
possible that David’s apparent frailty was actually a ruse to tempt potential
conspirators to act prematurely, and it succeeds. This also provides Shlomo the
pretext to eliminate Yoav (Joab,) something David had always wanted to do.
Tuesday, April 02, 2013
Who Really Killed Goliath?
In chapter 21 in the Book of Samuel, we read, “…and Elhanan
the son of Jaare-oregim the Beth-lehemite slew Goliath the Gittite.” Um... didn’t we read earlier that David slew
Goliath? One possibility: David was a
royal name he took up upon assuming the monarchy, and Elchanan was his name
previously (we see no references to David by name prior to his beginning on his
royal track.) Another possibility is
that the giant David killed in his youth was not Goliath. Once the back-and-forth between David and the
giant ensues in Samuel I 1:17, the giant is always referred to merely as, “the
Phillsitine,” or, “the uncircumcised one.”
Monday, April 01, 2013
Why David Didn't Go to War with Ammon
In Sefer Shmuel (The Book of Samuel) 21:17, David is almost
killed in battle, so the people ask him to stay behind in Jerusalem next time
while they go out and fight, lest “The Light of Israel,” i.e. David, is
extinguished. This is further evidence
that the events in chapter 21 occurred at the beginning of David’s reign, as
this would explain why, back in chapter 10, David did not go out to war against
the Ammonites with the rest of the army.
Sunday, March 31, 2013
If Michal Was Barren, How Did She Have Sons?
Chapter 21 of the Sefer Shmuel (the Book of Samuel) refers
to the five sons of Michal being hanged by the Givonim (Gibeonites.) This is a problem in and of itself as earlier
we learned that Michal was childless as a punishment for her indignity at
David’s dancing before the Ark of the Covenant.
Interpreters explain that there were five children of Merav, Michal’s
sister, who Michal had raised as if they were her own.
Friday, March 29, 2013
The True Location of Chapter 21 in the Book of Samuel
Chapter 21 of the Book of Samuel seems very nonsequitor, so
I will try to reconcile it with its context over the next several posts. First off, the chapter starts off with a
famine due to what Shaul had done to the Givonim (Gibeonites,) the resident
alien Canaanite workers in the Temple who, as non-citizens, had no legal
recourse. Why wait until after David had
dealt with his sin with Bat Sheva and all of the wars and revolts to deal with
this seemingly trivial matter? Rather,
it seems reasonable that this happened immediately after David assumed
power. This is evinced by the fact the
Givonim demand seven of the sons of Shaul, whom David delivers to them. Earlier in the Book of Samuel, we see David
asking if Shaul had surviving sons, so that would clearly have to have happened
after the incident with the Givonim.
Thursday, March 28, 2013
The Story fo David: Sin and Consequences
All of the chapters from David’s assuming power until his
putting down Sheva Ben Bichri’s revolt, which constitutes most of what is
written about David, seem to have been David’s sin with Bat Sheva and how he
dealt with his punishment. After that
point, the text seems to rewind and give a summary of the other relevant events
in David’s kingship in a single chapter (21.)
It seems that the most important thing the Prophets wanted us to know
about David was how he dealt with his sin.
Wednesday, March 27, 2013
Torah is More Interesting Than Liberalism
As an aside, if we had spent half the time in religious
school learning about Yoav’s Machiavelian political maneuvers and
up-close-and-personal assassinations of his opponents that we spent studying
the Holocaust and social justice, I would never have dropped out. I mean, what would a thirteen year old boy
rather watch, endless movies of bodies piled up at Auschwitz, or The Godfather.
Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Yoav's Fierce Loyalty to David and Himself
Sheva Ben Bichri declared another rebellion, Amasa (David’s
new chief of staff and Yoav’s replacement) joins in. David dispatches Yoav’s
hot-headed brother Avishai to deal with the revolt. Immediately we see that it is Yoav who
arranges to assassinate Amasa, who happens to be his cousin, pretending to be
interested in joining the revolt, and leaning over to kiss Amasa until suddenly
grabbing hold of his beard and plunging a sword into him. Yoav continues to
lead the charge and gets Sheva Ben Bichri.
Very typical of Yoav, fiercely loyal to his king even if he could have
rightly felt mistreated. He was able to
think for himself to go beyond or even
violate what he perceives as poorly devised orders but only in cases where
those violations coincide with his own self-interest.
Monday, March 25, 2013
The Long Kiss Goodnight
As David crosses the Jordan, he offers his loyal ally Barzilai
a position in his court. Barzilai
rejects, saying, “I am eighty years old… I can’t tell good from bad, or taste
what I eat and drink.” I.e., I’m getting
older and losing my head, so I won’t be much good to you. David kisses him and sends him off. In Tanach (Bible,) a kiss is always the final
time two people see one another, as with Ruth and Naomi in the Book of Ruth,
and Amasa later in Sefer Shmuel, and many other examples.
Sunday, March 24, 2013
Upon his return to the Land of Israel, David promotes Amasa,
the rebellious Avshalom’s chief of staff, as his own chief of staff, replacing
Yoav (Joab.) He pardons Shimei son of
Gera, who had verbally abused him as he fled Jerusalem, and pardons
Mephiboshet, who had also been accused of treason, and restores half his
estate. This is much like his generous
treatment of the survivors Shaul’s regime.
Making war against David is much like making war against the United
States. Losing is the best thing that
could ever happen to you.
Saturday, March 23, 2013
He Who is Kind to the Cruel will Become Cruel to the Kind
As David publicly weeps for his son Avshalom, turning his
victory into a day of mourning, Yoav
(Joab) comes to admonish him. “By loving those that hate you, and hating those
that love you… you have declared that you regard neither princes nor servants…
if Absalom had lived and we all had died today, then it would have been proper
in your eyes.” This is reminiscent of
the Talmudic dictum, “He who is kind to the cruel will eventually become cruel
to the kind.”
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Eli and David, Sitting by the Gate
Awaiting news from the battlefront, David, “Sat between two
gates,” until a runner arrives, which hearkens back to the very beginning of
the Book of Samuel (Sefer Shmuel) when Eli the Cohen Gadol (high priest) stands
on the city gates and awaits news of the battle with the Phillistines. Both Eli and David hope for good news only to
learn that their sons have died.
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
David Reasserts Himself
When Israel went to war with Ammon, David stayed behind,
seeming to lose heart as a monarch.
After his affair with Bat Sheva, he did not even go out to the city
gates to judge cases, as the courthouse in ancient Israeli cities was always in
the gate. He seemins to wonder, “How
could I judge when I have sinned so terribly.” It gave his son Avshalom the
political operating space to begin planning his rebellion, which started at
Jerusalem’s city gate. As the Israeli army marches out to do battle with the
renegade Avshalom, David first wants to go with them, and then stands by the
city gate and watches them pass. This
seems to indicate David is reasserting his military and judicial leadership.
Monday, March 18, 2013
Crossing the Jordan Then and Now (Then)
It is interesting that when David leaves Israel after being
deposed, he crosses the Jordan at Machanaim, the same place Jacob wrestled with
the angel all night upon his return to the land. When he eventually returns, he crosses the
Jordan at Gilgal, where the nation, led by Yehoshua (Joshua), first crossed
over the Jordan into the Land of Israel after 40 years in the desert. My personal take: these places seem to be
transit points into and out of Israel.
When David left, he was a deposed individual, as was the returning Jacob
(both at Machanaim.) Then David
returned, he came across with the nation, as did Yehoshua (both at Gilgal.)
Sunday, March 17, 2013
The Punishment for the Bat Sheva Affair
Following his affair with Bat Sheva, and his conspiracy to
have Bat Sheva’s husband killed but made to look like an accident, the
punishment meted out to him was measure for measure. As he had committed sexual impropriety, not
only was his daughter Tamar raped, but all of his concubines were violated by
his son. Much like Bat Sheva was first
seen on the roof of her building, so too these violations occurred on the roof
of the palace. Just as David conspired
to kill Uriah, so his son Avshalom conspired to kill him. Just as Uriah died, so three of his sons
died.
Saturday, March 16, 2013
Yoav (Joab) the Cryptic Character
Yoav (Joab) is, to me, the most interesting character I have
read about in Tanach (Bible) yet. You
have your Avraham (Abraham), Moshe (Moses,) and David types, who, while they
made mistakes, were clearly good. Then
you have your and Korach and Avimelech types, who were clearly bad. But with Yoav (Joab,) while he has the wily
intelligence and penetrating insight into human character helps him manipulate
others to do his will, his own motivations are mysterious. Did he assassinate Avner, and later Avshalom,
against the orders of the king, out of personal vengeance or out of a sense of
protecting the king from his own weakness?
He is fiercely loyal to David, but often directly violates his
orders. Most of his actions could be
taken as either good or bad, depending on his motivations, which remain a mystery
to us. David, for his part, always
curses Yoav, but states that the curse should be carried out by God, implying
he himself is unsure of Yoav’s motives.
Friday, March 15, 2013
The Ark of the Covenant is not a Toy
When David flees Avshalom’s rebellion, Zadok the Cohen tries
to bring the ark of the covenant. David
turns to him and tells him to bring it back to Jerusalem, saying, “If I find
favor in the eyes of God, then he will bring me back [to Jerusalem.]” This contrasts significantly with earlier in
Sefer Shmuel (the Book of Samuel,) when Israel brought the ark with them into
battle thinking it guaranteed victory.
David understands that the ark is not a secret weapon, but a sign of the
covenant, and if you’re violating your end of the covenant, the ark isn’t going
to help you.
Thursday, March 14, 2013
What is a "Yonat Elem Rechokim"?
Tehilla (Psalm) 56 begins, “For the
conductor, on yonath elem rehokim,” and then goes on to describe David’s
suffering during an episode where he was apparently captured by the
Phillistines (this does not appear in the narrative text of Sefer Shmuel, the
Book of Samuel.) But what is Yonat Elem Rechokim? Some speculate
that it is a reference to the madness David feigned, where he was twitching and
pecking like a dove (Yonah.) It may also just be an instrument on which
this Tehilla was played but which has now been forgotten.
Wednesday, March 13, 2013
God Doesn't Need Your Temple Sacrifice, but He Wants It
In Tehilla (Psalm) 50, God states, “I will not take from
your household a bull, from your pens any goats. For all the beasts of the
forest are Mine.” God doesn’t want sacrifices per se, as he control the
world and can get animals any time he wants. It’s like buying your wife
an anniversary present on a joint checking account. God doesn’t want to
make a profit on the transaction, what he is asking for is an affirmation of
the relationship.
Tuesday, March 12, 2013
Immortality is Children and Land Ownership
Yoav (Joab) sends the wise woman from Tekoa to convine
David to reconcile with his estranged son Avshalom using a parable. Her one
son has allegedly killed her other son, with her surviving murdering son facing execution
himself. She states, “and so they shall quench my coal which is left, so as not
to leave my husband a name or a remainder upon the face of the
earth." Again we see that the two links to immortality in Tanach are
children and land ownership.
Monday, March 11, 2013
Shakespeare and the Bible
As an aside, I’m noticing a lot of themes from Shakespeare
were borrowed from Tanach. David’s feigning madness to avoid the wrath of
the Phillistines is mirrored by Hamlet’s feigning madness to avoid the wrath of
Claudius. Likewise Uriah’s being sent to the front lines with sealed
orders for conspiracy to commit his own death is mirrored by Hamlet’s being
sent to England with sealed orders for his. The parable of trees choosing
a king is sort of mirrored by, "Macbeth shall never vanquished be, until
Great Birnam Wood to high Dunsinaine Hill Shall come against him."
(4.1.92-4) I’m trying to make a connection between Richard III
being surrounded and killed with Shaul’s being surrounded by Phillistines and
killed on Mount Gilboa.
Sunday, March 10, 2013
Land and Immortality
In Tehillim (Psalm) 49, the author states about the wise, “In their heart, their houses are
forever, their dwellings are for every generation; they call by their names on
plots of land."” The Tanach (bible) frequently associates two things
with immortality; descendants, “Their houses are houses forever,” and land
ownership, “They call by their names on plots of land.” It’s probably why
the Tanach repeats, over and over, the centrality of the Land of Israel to the
Nation of Israel.
Saturday, March 09, 2013
A Spring from Mount Zion
Tehilla (Pslam) 40 refers to the strength of God and then
makes a reference to a time when rivers spring forth from Jerusalem. The
prophets Yeshaya (Isaiah) and Yirmiyahu (Jeremiah) also make reference to a
future messianic time when rivers flow from the city. The neighboring
Kingdoms of Egypt and Babylon had the Nile and Euphrates rivers, and so never
felt the need to turn to God for sustenance. Israel, with its dry
climate, is entirely dependent upon the annual rains, forcing the people to
recognize their dependence on divine intervention. The rivers bursting forth
from the mountains of Israel in a future messianic time, will be a constant
reminder of divine intervention.
Friday, March 08, 2013
As A Thirsty Deer
In Tehilla (Psalm) 46, David
says, “You desired neither sacrifice nor meal offering; You dug ears for me; a
burnt offering or a sin offering You did not request.” This is
reminiscent of Shaul’s (King Saul’s) first blunder, when he makes a sacrifice
without following the Prophet Shmuel (Samuel’s) warning not to jump the gun and
do it too early. What David is saying is that it is the intent of
the sacrifice, far more than the act, which God demands. This is a
constant theme throughout Tanach (Bible.)
Thursday, March 07, 2013
Rebellion Brews Against David
After being denied the privilege of building the Beit
Hamikdash (Holy Temple,) one sees an increasing disconnect between David and
his kingdom. The text explicitly tells us that he did not go out to the
war against Ammon. Later, David seems unaware of his son Avshalom’s
(Absalom), clearly plotting revenge against David’s heir apparent Amnon for the
rape of Avshaloms sister Tamar, doesn’t seem to raise any alarm bells.
When Avshalom sits outside the gates of the palace gathering supporters, and
then heads off to Hebron with his supporters to, “Go make a sacrifice there,”
David also fails to pick up on this rebellion in progress.
Wednesday, March 06, 2013
Why Jews Have Beards
David delivered condolences to the people of his enemy
nation Ammon (located in present day Amman, Jordan,) a Torah prohibition.
Hanun, King of Ammon, takes David’s messengers and shaves off a half of each
one’s beard, a humiliation. David orders them to go to the city of
Jericho and wait for their beards to grow back. From this we infer the
proper Jewish look of having a beard, as David could have just as easily just
ordered them to simply shave off the other half. I’d have one too, if
mine didn’t get so very itchy and sore when I try to grow it.
Tuesday, March 05, 2013
Yoav the General
When Yoav (Joab) is besieging Ammon in retaliation for their
treatment of David’s emmisaries, he is suddenly attacked from the rear by an
army of Arameans. He splits his army into two, and sends his elite forces
to attack the Arameans while his main force goes against Ammon. It
reminds me of two sayings by Confederate General and military genius Nathan
Bedford Forrest, “Get there first with the most men,” and, “When surrounded,
split in two and attack both ways.”
Monday, March 04, 2013
David's First Sin as King
David committed a seemingly inconsequential sin by sending
condolences to Ammon, with whom the Torah prohibits friendly relations.
Ammon’s humiliation of David’s servants leads to a war, which his officer Uriah
is sent out to fight. With Uriah away from home, David succumbs to the
temptation to have an affair with his wife, then cover for the sin by having
Uriah (and some bystanders) killed in battle. So a small failure cascaded
into a great one, and David is cursed to spend the rest of his life living by
the sword because of it.
Sunday, March 03, 2013
As a Thirsty Deer
Psalm 42 begins, ” As a hart (deer) cries longingly for
rivulets of water, so does my soul cry longingly to You, O God.” The
Hebrew word used is “Taarog,” translated into, “cries.” The infinitive
verb, “Laarog,” is the word used to describe a distinctive seasonal cry of a
deer searching through the dry riverbeds of the Negev (Israel’s southern dry
region) for a puddle remaining from the floods of winter. It just goes to
show that to have a full understanding of the meaning of any line in Tanach
(Bible,) it is necessary to have an understanding of Hebrew, as well as the
flora, fauna, geography, climate, and seasons of the Land of Israel.
Saturday, March 02, 2013
David's Dancing
When David’s wife Michal, daughter of the late King Shaul,
sees David dancing with reckless abandon in front of the Ark as it enters
Jerusalem, she chastises him for conduct unbecoming of a king, to which David
replies that, before God, he is a lowly servant, and the text tells us Michal
never had children, seemingly a consequence of her statement. Michal is
still stuck with her father’s inappropriate sense of when to be regal and when
to be humble, and, like her father, her line is also extinguished.
Friday, March 01, 2013
Michal Bat Shaul
Sefer Shmuel (the Book of Samuel) explains Michal’s
childlessness as a consequence of her inappropriate scolding of David, but if
you think about it, Michal HAD to end up childless. God, through his
prophet Shmuel, had already taken the kingship from Shaul’s line for his failure
to destroy Amalek. At the same time, David was already married to Michal,
Shaul’s daughter, and had sworn to preserve Shaul’s line (implying having
children with her.) If Michal were to have a child, this child would have
been a descendant of Shaul but still part of royalty, violating God’s
curse. So the only way for both David and God to keep their contradictory
promises was for Michal to be barren.
Thursday, February 28, 2013
What Makes a Monarchy Secure?
David, sitting in his palace, sees that the Ark of the
Covenant is still sitting in the Mishkan tent, and wants to fulfill the
commandment to build the Beit Hamikdash (Holy Temple) now that the prerequisite
of a secure monarchy is fulfilled. God, using the prophet Nathan, stops
him. David mistook the meaning of a secure House of David for physical
security, sitting in his palace in fortified Jerusalem. But the true intent was
a spiritually secure House of David, and a monarchy is only secure if it is
passed on to the monarch’s son, which had never happened before in
Israel. Therefore, by definition, only the second generation of the House
of David, Shlomo (Solomon,) could build the Temple upon inheriting the throne.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Where is Jerusalem?
The Chumash (five books of Moses,) written four centuries
before the time of David, emphasizes the centrality of the then-future capital
of Jerusalem, but never gives a specific location though it could easily have
done so i.e., at the spring of Gihon, headwaters of the Kidron River, in the
shadow of the Mount of Olives, etc. Its location on the border between
Yehuda (Judah, David’s home tribe) and Binyamin (Benjamin, the tribe of the
previous King Saul) is almost an homage to the house of Shaul, although this
idea is not made explicit in the text. It seems a very earthly and
contemporary consideration for locating the divine and timeless, “Eternal
capital of the Jewish People.” Perhaps the idea of “Jerusalem” was known
since the time of the Chumash, but David selected its final temporal location.
Or am I just a heretic? J
Tuesday, February 26, 2013
What does, "Palestinian," Mean?
The Hebrew word Plishti, “Philistine,” is the noun form of
the Hebrew word, “Liphlosh,” to invade. After their failure to destroy
Israel in 1967, the Arabs of Israel adopted this name of the long-dead
seafaring Greek Philistines and began calling themselves, “Palestinians,”
ironically proclaiming themselves to be, “Invaders.”
Monday, February 25, 2013
Yoav's Ambush
After Yoav, David’s cousin and chief of staff, ambushes
Avner, the late King Shaul’s defecting chief of staff, David launches into a
dirge. He curses Yoav’s family with the words, “May God repay the
evildoer according to his evil.” One interpretation could be that David
thought Yoav might have been right to kill Avner, whose defection from his king
and fellow Benjaminite to David, a Judean, might have been a ruse. If Yoav was
wrong, he should be cursed, but if he was right, he did no evil and so there is
no evil to be repaid.
Sunday, February 24, 2013
David's Flight to the Philistines
The first time David flees Shaul to the Phillistine city of
Gat, the townspeople begin to rumble against him despite his feigning insanity
and he has to flee. The second time, he is actually welcomed with open
arms by King Achish, put in charge of a Phillistine city, and entrusted with
military command. One explanation for the Phillistine change of heart is
that word of Shaul’s hunting David had not yet become public knowledge the
first time he fled to Gat. By the second time, the dispute was well
known, and Achish thought he was spreading discord amongst his Israeli enemies
by sheltering an upstart rebel, David.
Saturday, February 23, 2013
Was the Necromancer for Real?
There are two schools of thought regarding King Shaul’s
(Saul’s) use of the Necromancer to raise the spirit of Shmuel (Samuel) from the
dead to inquire about his prospects against the Phillistine invasion force
gathering at Beit She’an. The rationalist school, followed by Rambam,
Rashi, etc., holds that it was entirely an act of smoke and mirrors, and there is
no reality to black magic or witchcraft. The alternative school of
thought, mostly Ramban and those with a more Kabbalistic bent, holds that dark
forces are very much real, but Torah forbids using them.
Friday, February 22, 2013
Shaul and the Necromancer
When the Necromancer raises the spirit of Shmuel (Samuel)
from the dead, who tells Shaul (Saul) that the kingdom will be taken from him
and given to David, he falls on his face. While we, the reader, knew
about Shmuel’s secretly anointing David as king, and have all this time seen
King Shaul as shamelessly hunting down his legitimate successor, for Shaul,
this is the first time he has been told that David was chosen by God to be his
successor all along.
David Loses his Tribe, but Gains the Northern Tribes
As David returns to the Land of Israel to rule again, one
sees the division between Yehudah (Judah,) who are the last to send messengers
to greet David, and Israel (the northern 10 tribes) who don’t hesitate to
reinstate him again. It is possible that
Yehudah was nervous, seeing as how Avshalom’s rebellion began in Hebron,
Yehudah’s capital city. It’s ironic that
the roles have now been reversed, with Israel embracing David while his own
tribe of Judah seems to be wary.
Thursday, February 21, 2013
Judging King Saul Favorably
Finished Shmuel Aleph (Samuel I.) Personally I feel a
great deal of sympathy for Shaul (Saul.) He was a good boy looking for
his dad’s lost sheep when suddenly Shmuel anoints him and proclaims him King of
Israel, a position he never sought. He is seized suddenly by the divine spirit,
which, after his failure at several critical moments for which he was
unprepared, was ripped away from him, along with his kingdom. He dies a
gruesome death on Mount Gilboa after seeing his three sons killed in front of
him. I think most of his actions can be justified.
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Shaul's Tragedy
In reviewing the life of Shaul (King Saul,) I think of his
story as a tragedy in the classical Greek sense, i.e. a noble hero with a
tragic flaw that undoes him. In Shaul’s case, I think of his flaw as a
lack of respect. He did not respect the monarchy enough to defend it
against slanderers early in his reign, or to uphold several oaths he as king
had made. He did not respect the Shmuel’s instructions to wait for the
prophet be present to make a sacrifice, or later to wipe out Amalek. And
he did not respect God’s decision, through Shmuel, to revoke his monarchy, and
went down fighting.
Tuesday, February 19, 2013
Why We Have Prophets
Look at David’s rise from the perspective of a citizen of
Israel at the time. After 400 years of anarchy, Israel finally has a
legitimate king, Shaul (Saul). Then David becomes a better warrior than
Shaul, moves in with and even serves militarily on the side of the
Phillistines, gathers an army of 600 outlaws, he has an altercation with Naval,
who mysteriously dies, and immediately marries Naval’s widow Avigayil. If
we didn’t have the prophets in Shmuel to tell us David’s motives were pure, we
would be inclined to think the worst. This may explain why it took seven years
from David’s coronation until his recognition as king by all the tribes of
Israel.
Personally Responsible, National Responsibility
David offers to go to battle against his son Avshalom, but
the people protest, because if he gets killed, what was the point of the war in
the first place? When Avshalom is
killed, against David’s orders, he sobs and weeps over the loss of his son,
even though it is his own victory and salvation. In both cases, David evinces the tension
between what he personally wants to go and do, and what the proper behavior of
a king is.
Monday, February 18, 2013
Was the Mishkan Functional in Shaul's Time?
When David, fleeing the suspicious Shaul, comes to the
Cohanim (Priests) of the Mishkan (tabernacle) at Kiryat Yearim, they offer him
some of the Lechem Hapanim (Temple Bread,) which is forbidden to David, a
non-Cohen, in Halachah (Jewish Law.) One
explanation is that David was starving and was fed only to save his life,
permissible in Halachah. However, I find
this interpretation a bit difficult as he had been travelling a great deal
already, seemingly without trouble, and because he took enough to last many
days, which would seem to be going beyond the bare necessities of survival
permitted by Halachah. Another possible
explanation is that the Mishkan at Kiryat Yearim was not fully functional so
soon after the destruction of the Mishkan in Shiloh by the Phillistines, so the
bread did not yet have the status of actual Lechem Papanim and exception could
be made.
Sunday, February 17, 2013
Avigayil the Eshet Chayil
When David is shamed by Naval he prepares to fight, but
Naval’s wife Avigayil (Abigail) calms him down and reasons with him. Ten days later Naval dies of natural causes
(alcohol poisoning is implied,) and David marries Avigayil. The text also says that he marries Achinoam,
the same name as the wife of his now bitter enemy, Shaul (Saul.) Coincidence?
It seems to imply that, by marrying the guy’s wife, he has completely
defeated him (both Naval and Shaul.)
Personally, I think that David just realized that Avigayil
had calmed him down, reasoned with him, and prevented him from doing something
he would later come to regret. All
characteristics of a good wife, like mine!
Saturday, February 16, 2013
Do What's Right in Your Own Eyes
Nachash the Ammonite threatens to shame the townspeople of
Yavesh Gilead by blotting out their eyes, branding them as his slaves rather
than God’s. When Shaul gathers an army to fight back, the people of Yavesh
Gilead respond, “Tomorrow we will fight you, do what’s right in your own
eyes.” A beautiful way of throwing Nachash’s words back at him.
Friday, February 15, 2013
The Seeds of Division
When Shaul (Saul) gathers an army to fight the Nachash the
Ammonite, the army is numbered as 300,000 from Israel and 30,000 from
Judea. Apparently the seeds of the eventual division of the united
monarchy of Shaul, David, and Shlomo (Solomon) into the northern Kingdom of
Israel and the southern Kingdom of Judea upon the death of Shlomo 101 years
later had already been sown from its inception.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
Shaul's Three to David's Six
Shaul’s (Saul) army is always a number divisible by three
(300,000 Israelites, 30,000 Judeans). David’s is divisible by six (600
men.) Shaul is listed as having one wife and three sons; David, upon his
coronation, has two wives and six sons. That David is always listed as
having double what Shaul does seems to be a hint of David’s two-faceted
monarchy, both military and spiritual, whereas Shaul’s was exclusively
military. The number three also appears repeatedly in Shoftim (the Book
of Judges) hinting that Shaul was still connected to the anarchy of the past
whereas David was able to make the break and become a divine monarch.
It's a Shame about Mephiboshet
One of Shaul’s descendants who was hanged by the Givonim was
named Mephiboshet, yet earlier in the book (but later in time) David found
Mephiboshet, son of Yonatan (Jonathan,) and took him into his court. Apparently there were two Mephiboshets. Incidentally, according to Divrei Yamim (The
Book of Chronicles) the suffix “Boshet” was originally “Baal,” the Canaanite
idol. The prophetic authors of the text
did a find-replace and switched, “Baal,” idol, with, “Boshet,” shame. Shaul’s descendants seem to have fallen into
shame in that they were naming their children after idols.
David's Appropriate Punishment
Following his affair with Bat Sheva, and his conspiracy to
have Bat Sheva’s husband killed but made to look like an accident, the
punishment meted out to him was measure for measure. As he had committed sexual impropriety, not
only was his daughter Tamar raped, but all of his concubines were violated by
his son. Much like Bat Sheva was first
seen on the roof of her building, so too these violations occurred on the roof
of the palace. Just as David conspired
to kill Uriah, so his son Avshalom conspired to kill him. Just as Uriah died, so three of his sons
died.
Wednesday, February 13, 2013
Whither Amalek?
Agag, the King of Amalek and final survivor of Shaul’s (King
Saul) attack on them, is killed by Shaul. How is it that the Amalekites
reappear during David’s time? One possibility is that Agag was king over
just one tribe within the nation of Amalek. Another possibility is that
the work Amaleki comes to mean Amalek-like behavior; anyone who takes advantage
of another’s weakness.
The Bat Sheva Affar: Forgiven, not Forgotten
After David’s son Amnon raped his daughter Tamar, David
remained silent on the matter, apparently thinking that his own sin with Bat
Sheva (Bathsheba) would open him up to the accusation that he was in no
position to pass judgement. This leads David’s son Avshalom to take
matters into his own hands, which causes his eventual rebellion and
death. Even though the prophet Natan has declared that God forgave David’s
sin, the consequences keep coming. Apparently, to forgive is not the same
as to forget.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Samuel Descends from Korah
Shmuel (Samuel) was the direct descendant of Korach, who led
the rebellion against Moshe after the Torah was given. Both had the
middah (personality trait) of speaking back to power, Korach for personal gain,
Shmuel for the benefit of the nation. Shmuel was a tikkun (repair) for
Korach’s actions.
Monday, February 11, 2013
When was David Annointed?
Shmuel (Samuel) secretly anoints David as king in chapter
16, and then the story jumps ahead to David, now an established warrior,
playing the lyre to calm down Shaul. Chapter 17 tells of the battle
between David and Goliath which made David’s warrior reputation in the first
place, and chronologically seems to fit in the middle of chapter 16. One
explaination for the seeming discontinuity is that chapter 16 is the final
chapter of Shmuel’s prophecy before he went into retirement, and the next
author, the prophet Gad, picks up with David’s story a little bit earlier than
Shmuel had left off.
David and Goliath; the Underlying Meaning
David comes to the battlefield finding Goliath taunting the
Israeli army. To paraphrase:
Goliath: You are all slaves of Shaul (King Saul.) I
have shamed you!
David (to the army): Are you guys going to let this
uncircumcised Philistine talk to you like that?
What shame is he referring to? Since a slave can’t
have two masters, by accusing them of being slaves of Shaul, he implies they
are not slaves of God, a major insult. David brings up the fact that
Goliath is uncircumcised, as circumcision is the “branding” of a slave of God,
and reminding army of its true master.
Saturday, February 09, 2013
The Rights of a King
When the people ask Shmuel (Samuel) to appoint a King of
Israel, he threatens them that the king will conscript their sons for
soldiering and labor, take women for servants, and confiscate their
property. It is noteworty that he does not threaten that the king will
take their daughters as wives and concubines, given that this disregard for
women’s rights was commonplace throughout the ancient world and appears
repeatedly within the Tanach (bible.) It seems that such licentiousness
is completely unthinkable for a God-fearing person, even one with absolute
power.
Friday, February 08, 2013
The loss of the Ark
When Eli heard that the Israeli army had been defeated by
the Phillistines, he took the news like a man. When he heard that both
his sons were killed in the battle, he accepted it. When he heard that
the Phillistines had captured the ark, he fell to the floor, broke his neck,
and died. Pinchas’ wife has the same reaction and goes into labor and
dies. This seems to indicate a level of spiritual failure of the people,
that the army was defeated with tremendous loss of life, yet what really caused
grief and anguish was the loss of this inanimate object.
Thursday, February 07, 2013
Hofni and Pinchas' Sins
The people complain that the sons of the Cohen Gadol (High
Priest) Eli are accused of delaying people from making sacrifices at the
Mishkan (tabernacle,) spearing the choicest meats from the sacrifices for
themselves, and sleeping with the women who came to make sacrificial
offerings. Later, Eli confronts his sons about the first two accusations,
but not the last. This would seem to indicate that Eli investigated the
accusations and found that the first two were true, but the accusations of
sexual misconduct lacked merit.
Wednesday, February 06, 2013
Groups of Three
The book of Shmuel (Samuel) has as an underlying theme, the
dynamic tension between groups of three. First is the decline of the House of
Eli the Cohen Gadol (High Priest) and his wayward sons Hofni and Pinchas set
against the rising House of Tzuf with parents Elkana, Hannah, and their son
Shmuel. Later the ageing Shmuel and his two corrupt sons Aviyah and Yoel
decline against the rising House of Shaul (Saul,) Shaul’s his son Yonatan
(Johnothan,) and his chief of staff Avner (Abner.) This is followed by
the decline of the house of Shaul against the rising House of David with
Evyatar, his Cohen Gadol, and Gad, his prophet.
Tuesday, February 05, 2013
Hannah's Song
When Channah (Hannah) goes to the Mishkan (tabernacle) in
Shiloh to pray for fertility, she sings a poetic song, one of seven songs which
appear in Tanach (the Jewish bible.) Her song includes a prayer for
children, but has many other references to wars, poverty and other things which
don’t seem to be connected to Channah’s situation. It is possible that
this was a song which was generally used at that time in praying for children,
even though it carried many other references, much like the Tehillim (Psalms)
which are recited today for the same purpose.
Monday, February 04, 2013
Chanukkah Fun Fact
Hanukkah fun fact: Hanukkah literally means, “dedication,”
celebrating the rededication of the temple in Jerusalem after a period of
oppression. When taking a college course on the ancient middle east, I
asked Dr. Drake, my secular Gentile professor, why he thought the Jews had
survived when all the other peoples the course was covering had long
vanished. To paraphrase his answer, “Simple. When other peoples
were defeated, they assumed their god was weak and their enemy’s god was
strong, so they switched gods. When the Babylonians hauled the Jews into
slavery, they decided that their God hadn’t failed or abandoned them, rather
they had failed and abandoned their God. It was a unique innovation that helped
them rededicate and reenergize themselves in exile.”
Sunday, February 03, 2013
Posting my Chiddushim
In merit of Elisha Meir Refael Ben Devorah, my wife’s coworker’s son suffering from severe illness who should have a speedy recovery, as well as that the people of Israel should merit safety and security, about a month ago during the latest Gaza conflict I started learning through the OU’s Nach Yomi podcast. You listen to one chapter per day of Nach (Prophets and Writings,) the final 19 books of the Jewish Bible, and over the course of two years you can complete the cycle and have a relatively in-depth understanding of the entire thing. Each mp3 lesson is anywhere from 20 to 40 minutes long, about the length of my commute. Since they just started Ketuvim and are in Tehillim (Psalms) right now, I decided to keep up with the podcast on my drive to work, but learn Nevi’im (Prophets) when I’m on my way home to try to finish the cycle a bit faster, so I’m learning Sefer Shmuel (the Book of Samuel) concurrently. I will post interesting chiddushim (novel concepts) I hear here on my blog, Planet Israel.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)